Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Fruits of the Loom: A Fetishisation of Success? Exploring women’s gains in the loomweaving industry

Abstract

This essay primarily argues that antipoverty programmes have long been a gendered arena and thus considers some of the assumptions about the ‘poor’ and about ‘gender’ and how it is used in an antipoverty programme. It has two main objectives: first, describe and analyse the discourse of poverty in antipoverty policy platforms from a gendered perspective; and second, apply this analysis to a poverty reduction project using a case study of a women loomweavers multi-purpose cooperative in the Philippines. The case study links macroeconomic policy on poverty with a locally-implemented poverty reduction programme in the Philippines. It examines how the dominant discourse of poverty primarily based on conventional conceptions and the ‘feminisation of poverty’ thesis, selectively appropriating women’s issues in certain development areas, has been acted out in different antipoverty policy platforms in the country. To some extent, this seems to produce a partial notion of “success” in the development intervention focused on the women loomweavers’ multipurpose cooperative, because it assumes that the gains women loomweavers get from the project also equitably redound to the benefit of all members of their household. This lack of serious attention to gender differences and intrahousehold dynamics in antipoverty programmes may undermine poverty reduction in itself while reinforcing gender stereotypes at the local context.

Introduction
Economic restructuring has altered and shaped the needs, priorities and realities of populations. It has brought national governments and development organisations together in a web of standardised macroeconomic policy prescriptions contained in antipoverty programmes bearing neoliberal constructions of the ‘poor’ and ‘gender’ that has put premium on conventional econometric parameters over experiences of growing insecurity and vulnerability. Technologies of governmentality based on conventional conceptions of poverty have framed the poor as a ‘social problem’ therefore, ‘has to be handled and managed’.
However, the increased concern with global poverty has led to a rethinking within development discourses of the approaches to poverty as well as to development organizations requiring poverty assessments coupled with an increased awareness on gender as a condition for development aid (Chhachhi, 2009a). This “need to incorporate gender differences has not only increasingly been taken on board in poverty analysis but in policy and practice too” (Chant, 2008:171).

In recent years, “there has been a growing recognition of the importance of macroeconomic policy in shaping women’s living standards and their prospects for economic empowerment” (Elson in Budlender et al, 2002:23). Evidenced amply in policy rhetoric, Rodenberg (2004:iv in Chant, 2008:172) further describes that this is a ‘winwin’ formula which links greater gender equity, economic growth and effective poverty alleviation. Yet the manner by which gender has been incorporated in the burden of coping with poverty in households, through the ‘feminisation’ of antipoverty programmes, has sometimes exacerbated living conditions and reinforced gender stereotypes.

This essay attempts to examine whether an antipoverty programme has adequately considered the intersecting realities of poverty and gender. It has two main objectives: first, describe and analyse the discourse of poverty in policy platforms from a gendered perspective; and second, apply this analysis to a poverty reduction project using a case study of a women loomweavers multi-purpose cooperative.
By drawing on feminist positions highlighting the significance of tracing the gendered dynamics of poverty, the essay will demonstrate that poverty is couched in social relations, including gender relations and underscore that the lack of serious attention to gender differences and intra-household dynamics in antipoverty programmes may undermine poverty reduction in itself while reinforcing gender stereotypes.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Argumentative Analysis:

Backgrounder: Excerpt from a news article on the issue

Deceiving "Apology" Proves GMA Can No Longer Govern


Posted on June 28, 2005 - 6:43pm :: Editorial
Nicanor Perlas
27 June 2005

In recent weeks, a supposedly unauthorized wiretap rocked the nation by recording a scandalous conversation between a woman and an official of the Comelec or Commission on Elections. The tapes revealed that the woman, who sounded like Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, the President of the Philippines, was conspiring to bring about fraudulent election results with a commissioner of the Comelec. The Philippine Constitution mandates the Comelec to uphold clean and honest elections.

For weeks, "President" Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) refused to comment on whether she was the woman on the tape. She maintained stoic silence. Meanwhile, the protests grew louder, bigger, and more organized. Then, suddenly, last night, PGMA appeared on nationwide television and radio. She finally admitted that she was the female voice in the wiretap recordings. She also apologized for her "lapse of judgment" in calling a Comelec official under questionable circumstances. She did not, however, admit any guilt and called on the nation to forgive and join her in rebuilding the nation.

Norming and De-norming in People’s Use of Local Primary Health Care Facilities

Norming and De-norming in People’s Use of Local Primary Health Care Facilities

Applying Logical Positivist and Postmodernist Approaches

Introduction

The seemingly ideal approach “bringing health closer to the people” has been employed in primary health care services around the world. Yet, one wonders at the interstices of policy and practice that belie the smooth-functioning of primary health care systems.

Looking into approaches under which theories and models may be subsumed is an integral part of the research process, the value being that it “shapes the way practitioners, educators, and researchers collect, analyze, interpret, and disseminate information” (McElmurry et al, 2002:8). “To be effective, we must deconstruct our ways of “knowing” and understanding the influence of the values and philosophies forming the foundation of our practice, teaching, and research” (ibid).

This essay seeks to demonstrate how the research question ‘Why do some people not use local primary health care facilities?’ may be appreciated differently by using a logical positivist and postmodernist research approach. I would like to outline this exposition by first discussing feature tenets of both logical positivism and postmodernism then illustrating the application of some of these major claims of each approach vis-à-vis the conventional medical model1 applied in primary health care.

The Logical Positivist Approach: Norming health care

Logical positivists tender knowledge as best guess saying that no amount of empirical evidence would justify universal theory, hence, verification is impossible (Siegmann, 2009a). However, it does not preclude the idea that empirical evidence may justify the claim that a universal theory is false, therefore it posits that falsification is possible (Siegmann, 2009b).

_____________________

1The conventional medical model uses a logical positivism philosophy, or empiricism, to verify cause and affect relationships for all human experiences (Wilson-Thomas 1995 in McElmurry, 2008:8).

Karl Popper argues for the falsifiability criterion where “a scientist seeks to discover an observed exception to a postulated rule” (Science Chat Forum, 2007). The absence of contradictory evidence thereby becomes proof of the theory (ibid). There is “therefore a preference for theories whose falsehood has not been established” (Siegmann, 2009c). Thomas Kuhn rejects Popper’s view by proposing that “it is not the products of science that are important, but the way in which scientists conduct their inquiry (Schick, 2000).

Logical positivists believe in an objective reality independent of observation (Siegmann, 2009d). They argue that this reality is reflected in techniques guaranteeing replicability and underline the distance between the researcher and the researched (ibid). They accept that empirical content guarantees testability and propose the exclusion of values due to lack of testability.

I proceed to relating this particular approach to people’s use of local primary health care facilities within the frame of a conventional medical model. The logical positivist may hypothesize that all people make use of local primary health care facilities and proceeds to falsify this universal claim through empirical evidence that proves otherwise. The absence of contradictory evidence proves the strength of the theory while the existence of a case that contradicts it warrants a study on why people do not use local primary health care facilities and thus establish cause and effect relationships “with the goal to describe, predict, and control human responses” (McElmurry, 2002:8).

Researchers subscribing to the idea that reality is independent of the observer may use this approach to “locate the ‘problem’ within the individual and consider the health-care professional as the expert responsible for curing disease and dysfunction and ‘helping’ people to achieve ‘health and normalcy’” (McElmurry, 2002:8; Oliver 1998 in McElmurry, 2002:8). This position suggests that there is a universal notion of “being healthy” and if one deviates from such norm, one is “unhealthy” thereby prescribing the need to seek the closest medical care available, the local primary health care facility. Researchers are also bound to establish causal relations through methods that include “controlled trials, random statistical samples, and structured questionnaires” (McElmurry, 2002:8), in the process, excluding “personal histories and experiences which are not validated, and where dialogue and sharing appear to be irrelevant in the process” (Wilson-Thomas 1995 in McElmurry, 2002:9).

The Postmodernist Approach: De-norming health care

Postmodernists believe that there is not one correct description of reality. It proposes “uncertainty as certainty” which is further explained with the message of the impossibility of knowledge closure on the past or the future as well as the inclination towards contextual relativism, “local rationalities”, thick/rich narratives, and the rejection of all claims to universal knowledge (Cameron, 2009a). “For this reason, postmodernism is highly skeptical of explanations which claim to be valid for all groups, cultures, traditions, or races, and instead focuses on the relative truths of each person” (PBS, 2009a).

As postmodernists argue that neither deduction nor induction can be freed from language and power, it sets on to employ deconstruction as a methodology by both ‘reading’ actively and reflecting on closures, metaphors, and silences in knowledge claims (Cameron, 2009b). When applied in research, there is recognition of the greater presence of the researcher and the reader but at the same time stressing more on the language of the researched rather than of policy agencies as a way of recognizing power relations (ibid). Its methodology gives more importance to the ethical right to inclusion which considers the range rather than the average experience while being open to the inevitability of unintended outcomes (ibid).

My thinking is predisposed towards arguing that the postmodernist would acknowledge that “as we increasingly work with culturally diverse groups, knowledge must be constructed in a manner that accurately reflects the nature of diversities and the consequences on responses to health” (Im & Meleis 1999 in McElmurry, 2002:8) while the logical positivist may “not consider the values embedded in society nor one's social position as an over-arching determinant of health status (Parsons 1999 in McElmurry, 2002:8) and thus fail to explain the social and environmental factors that account for people’s access and use of primary health care facilities such as “skyrocketing medical care costs, decreasing access to health care and increasing disparities in health care status among various groups of people” (McElmurry, 2002:9).

The postmodernist is sensitive to ‘stakeholding’ analysis to ensure inclusion of all testimonies in their own languages (Cameron, 2009c). It would find problematic the narrow construction of health care by the conventional medical model as it ignores differences in cultural attitudes and values such as what clients perceive as health problems. Power inequity exists as the model views people as passive recipients of medical care (McElmurry, 2002:9) there being, less privileged in claiming what for them is health as well as what is good for their health.

Conclusion

I have presented the nuances of the research question at hand by arguing that both approaches have their own epistemological limitations in that the logical positivist is normative in its conception and prescription towards health and access to it while the postmodernist is open to agentive spaces that acknowledge the range of knowledge, values and attitudes that people may have towards health care. Nevertheless, I try to avoid closure by saying that both leave an epistemological space for debate and have the potential to negotiate and challenge understanding of the research question within the realm of philosophy and methodology.

References

Cameron, J. (2009) 4223-0809 Session 6: Philosophy and Methodology of Social Science Research: The Roots of Postmodernist/Structuralist Epistemology Powerpoint Presentation, ISS: Development Research: Comparative Epistemologies and Methodologies

McElmurry, B.J., B.A. Marks, R. Cianelli, (2002) ‘Primary Health Care in the Americas: Conceptual Framework, Experiences, Challenges and Perspectives’, [Online], Available: http://www.paho.org/English/HSP/HSO/HSO07/primaryhealthcare.doc [15 Feb 2009].

Messer, E. (1985) ‘Social science perspectives on primary health care activities: Paper presented at the United Nations University Conference on Nutrition in Primary Health Care held in Bellagio, Italy, 1-6 July 1985’, [Online] http://www.unu.edu/Unupress/food/8F123e/8F123E07.htm [7 Feb 2009].

PBS, (2009) ‘Postmodernism’, [Online], Available: http://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/postm-body.html [15 Feb 2009].

Schick, T., C.A. Mountainview eds. (2000) ‘Readings in the Philosophy of Science: From Positivism to Postmodernism’, [Online], Available: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2320/is_1_65/ai_78487199/pg_6?tag=content;col1 [10 Feb 2009].

Science Chat Forum (2007) ‘Science and Philosophy Forum Index: Logical Positivism’, [Online], http://www.sciencechatforum.com/bulletin/viewtopic.php?t=5626 [15 Feb 2009].

Siegmann, K. (2009) 4223-0809 Session 5: Philosophy and Methodology of Social Science Research: Logical Positivism Powerpoint Presentation, ISS: Development Research: Comparative Epistemologies and Methodologies

Space and Motion (2009) ‘On Truth & Reality The Spherical Standing Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) in Space: Postmodernism’, [Online], Available: http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Philosophy-Postmodernism.htm [14 Feb 2009].

(En)countering Exclusion in Policy and Lived Experience

(En)countering Exclusion in Policy and Lived Experience: Exploring the Intersections of Differential Exclusions of the Badjao People in the Philippines

An Epistemological Analysis

I. On the Research

The Problem

This study examines the differential exclusions of the Badjao people, the sea nomads of the Philippines in terms of policy and lived experience across gender, socioeconomic status and generation and how the Badjao from across sections of their community navigate through this marginalization and social exclusion.

Contextual Background

Numbering to about a total of 107,000 in the whole country, the Badjao thrive on the sea, “traveling by boat from one island to the next in search of a fishing harvest” (Joshua Project, 2009a). Historically, they held no land or other property ashore, except for small burial islands and are a highly fragmented people with no overall political unity (Joshua Project, 2009b). Among the indigenous groups in the Philippines, the Badjao is regarded as the most marginalized, even “known to other tribes living in the same area as 'palau' or 'lumaan,' both meaning "godforsaken" (Joshua Project, 2009c). In a recent study, Professor Aurora Roxas-Lim of the University of the Philippines' Asian Center says that the prejudices against the Badjao often stem from the preconception that all nomadic people are by nature shiftless, rootless, irresponsible and unreliable (UN Philippines, 2002:86). The exclusion from welfare and access to public services is rooted on this “territorial unboundedness” and oftentimes has caused the inferior status accorded to the Badjao and their nomadic way of life. This exclusion coupled with an increasing disregard for the Badjao’s concern over the security of their fishing grounds has pushed many of their women and men, including children, to earn their livelihood through begging, may this be in city streets or in maritime waters where ports are present.

In 1997, the Philippines formulated a key national policy framework in the effort to uphold national unity, prospectively embodied in the Republic Act No. 8371 otherwise known as the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA). Based on ILO Convention 169, the policy was enacted to recognize, protect and promote the rights of indigenous cultural communities/indigenous peoples in the Philippines (NCIP, 2008:1-25). It is an embodiment of the rights and aspirations of indigenous peoples which are as follows: right to ancestral domains, right to self-governance and empowerment, social justice and human rights, and cultural integrity (NCIP, 2008:1-25). Yet, even with this strong enunciation of protection for indigenous peoples, problems of realization of its provisions still exist.

Also, the inclusiveness of the IPRA is challenged on the basis of the applicability of its espoused land-based territorial concepts vis-à-vis the Badjao[1], Chou (2006:2) contends that the phenomenon of sea nomadism is less known and has thus challenged the classical idea of citizenship that is defined within bounded territories and guaranteed by a sovereign state. The question posed here is whether “the inalienable human rights of the Badjao as a distinct sea-based indigenous ethnic group who look at their sea-world as without borders and respect for their inalienable right to freedom of movement as inherent in their privilege” (Neofilipino, 2008), are deemed included, therefore recognized and acknowledged under the IPRA.

It is in this light that I have posed this central question: How do Badjao people from across gender, socioeconomic status and generation experience differential exclusions in terms of policy and lived reality? From these differential experiences of exclusion (taking into consideration gender, socioeconomic status and age groups), I would like to draw out how this socially differentiated group may have experienced exclusion from the state or from other practices of social exclusion obtaining in their community. Also, I would like to look into the inclusiveness or otherwise of the IPRA, which purport to uphold the rights of all indigenous peoples of the Philippines by exploring within the interstices of the policy discourses informed by material conditions that have shaped the language of the policy and in turn produce and reproduce social reality in Philippine society.

II. Behind the Research

Feminist Postmodern Approach

The broader framework of my study relies on a feminist postmodern approach. First of all, a key point in a postmodern approach that this research takes on, draws from the works of theorists like Foucault, Lyotard, Derrida, among others, which stresses on locality, partiality, contingency, instability, uncertainty, ambiguity and essential contestability of any particular account of the world, the self, and the good (Anderson, 2000a). Butler (1990) notes that the oft-cited claim that gender is socially or discursively constructed — that it is an effect of social practices and systems of meaning that can be disrupted — finds one of its homes in postmodernism (ibid). The postmodernist emphasizes the situatedness and contestability of any particular claim or system of thought and delegitimizes ideas that dominate and exclude by undermining their claims to transcendent justification; thus it opens up space for imagining alternative possibilities that were obscured by those claims (ibid). Postmodernist theory drives the point that there can be no complete, unified theory of the world that captures the whole truth about it, therefore, the selection of any particular theory or narrative is an exercise of “power” — to exclude certain possibilities from thought and to authorize others (ibid).

Postmodernism has figured more prominently in internal critiques of feminist theories such as exposing and responding to exclusionary tendencies within feminism itself particularly the concept “woman” — the central analytical category of feminist theory (ibid). Feminist postmodernists are more inclined to take the view that gender is not the site but one site of social identity. Thus, beginning from the standpoint of the woman becomes partial, therefore incomplete when it takes on a feminist perspective that focuses only on gender inequality in isolation from other forms of inequality (Van der Hoogte & Kingma, 2004). The idea of intersectionality, a term coined by Kimberle Crenshaw, is that different subjectivities and ‘social structures do not combine in purely additive ways’ (Weldon, 2005:13) but are mutually reinforcing one another. Nash notes that ‘progressive scholarship requires a nuanced conception of identity that recognizes the ways in which positions of dominance and subordination work in complex and intersecting ways to constitute subjects’ experiences of personhood’ (2008:10). Van der Hoogte & Kingma (2004) also add “that the failure to recognise the importance of people’s multiple identities leads to a failure to address the discrimination against individuals and groups which arises out of this.

Despite the charge that “postmodern emphasis on ‘fractured identities’ and multitude of subjectivities seems to end in total relativism precluding political action” (Naples & Sachs, 2000:203), advocates of postmodernism still argue that it represents a vehicle for and response to these critiques as it proposes perspective-shifting as a strategy for negotiating the proliferation of theories produced by differently situated women (ibid). Challenging the epistemic privilege claimed by feminist standpoint theorists, “feminist postmodernism thus envisions our epistemic situation as characterized by a permanent plurality of perspectives, none of which can claim objectivity — that is, transcendence of situatedness to a “view from nowhere” (ibid). Anderson points out to two types of epistemic practice in negotiating the range of situated knowledges which include: (a) acceptance of responsibility, which involves acknowledging the choices of situation that entered into the construction of one's representations (Haraway 1991), and considering how one's situation affects the content of one's representations (Harding 1993); (b) “world traveling” (Lugones 1987) or “mobile positioning” — trying to see things from many other perspectives. This also further suggests that these perspectives are constantly shifting rather than static.

Methodology

Postmodern theorizing demonstrates sensitivity toward a greater multiplicity of power relations (Naples & Sachs, 2000:203). Some feminist ethnographers have used self-reflexive techniques to reveal how power and difference construct encounters in the field (ibid:204). Diane Wolf has emphasized three interrelated dimensions by which power is discernible: (1) power difference stemming from different positionalities of the researcher and the researched (race, class, nationality, life chances, urban-rural background); (2) power exerted during the research process, such as defining the research relationship, unequal exchange, and exploitation; and (3) power exerted during the postfieldwork – writing and representing (Wolf 1996b:2 in Naples & Sachs, 2000:203). For example, using a feminist modern approach, Shelley Feldman and Rick Welsh deconstruct the farm household to show how social relations on farms are constituted by divergent interests (ibid:198).

As this research aspires to analyze the production of knowledge about different Badjao people as well as its impact on them, there is a need to do fieldwork and generate primary data otherwise; one would get skewed impression and incomplete picture of the exclusions against them. Combining narrative inquiry and discourse analysis play a considerable role both in telling the story of the Badjao as they navigate around their differentiated, marginalized, if not subjectified identities along the margins while understanding how the resulting discourses are produced and reproduced to cast a metaphorical and material root of marginalization.

Narrative Inquiry

Narrative inquiry through interviews and storytelling shall be used to draw the experiences of women and men in the Badjao community in relation to being and belonging to a differentiated group paying attention to their specific locations (gender, socioeconomic status, age, and other positions and the intersections of such) in order to understand the context of their stories. These shall include participant observation, casual conversations, and life histories through semi-structured life interviews. Life history research method shall be used to understand more about individual lives from their own perspectives in terms of their identity, constraints, turning points, aspirations and opportunities. As the life history chronicles the living testimonies of everyday experiences of ordinary people, this shall be used to explore the varying experiences among members of the Badjao community from different gender identities, socioeconomic status, and generation --- in how they view themselves as members of a larger community and how they navigate through their everyday lives including dealing with exclusions. These may be supported by other methods like key informant interviews and other interactionist methods that may be called for in the field in order to saturate data, fill in data gaps or for community validation but these can only be considered upon knowing whether these are culturally appropriate techniques and upon the community’s permission.

Discourse Analysis

By examining policy as discourse, I would like to develop a framework of understanding the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion of the Badjao people within the discursive space of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act taking into consideration the historical, spatial and social context. Taking policy as text may “yield some interesting insights, notably in the language used to describe the people who are the objects of the policy” (Cameron, 2009).

One usage of discourse analysis defines discourse as “an ensemble of ideas, concepts, and categories through which meaning is given to phenomena” (Hajer 1993 in Gasper & Apthorpe, 1996:2). Hajer (1993:45 in Gasper & Apthorpe, 1996:2) explains that discourses frame certain problems; that is to say, they distinguish some aspects of a situation rather than others. This means that frames help us identify what we address and what we neglect. In applying this to the IPRA, the critical question is that despite being considered as a relatively inclusive legal instrument for the realization of rights of the indigenous peoples, “why does the issue of marginalization of the indigenous peoples persist?” Yanow (2009) speaks of the intractability of certain issues which may require going back to how the issue or problem is perceived rather than making a calculation as to the best solution. Hence, the intractable character of the issue of marginalization of indigenous peoples shall be explored by arguing against how this issue/problem is viewed from the point of public policy –how public policy has resorted to tackling such issue by resorting to the quest for the best course of action towards the indigenous group of peoples, that is, recognizing their rights through policy/law; instead of taking a step back and looking at the meaning-making process – how policy has viewed the indigenous peoples by examining how indigenous peoples are defined in the IPRA, which I further argue has framed them within a box influenced by modernistic definitions and ideologies.

Citing the other usage of discourse which claims that “‘discourse’ is not just a set of words, it is a set of rules about what you can and cannot say’ (Barrett 1995 in Gasper & Apthorpe 1996:4) which leads to the claim that “‘discourse’ is “practice and theory” – material activity which transforms nature and society and the modes of thought that inform action…” (Moore 1995:30 in Gasper & Apthorpe, 1996:4), I will use critical discourse analysis to support the understanding of how and why the policy is articulated in such a manner and how it reflects the pervading power relations and material conditions in the society where the policy is basically couched in. CDA is concerned with studying and analyzing written texts and spoken words to reveal the discursive sources of power, dominance, inequality, and bias and how these sources are initiated, maintained, reproduced, and transformed within specific social, economic, political, and historical contexts (Van Dijk 1988 in McGregor, 2004).

Using frame analysis and critical discourse analysis, I shall look into how state policy views the indigenous peoples by examining the IPRA, and draw out discourses that represent the existing power relations in Philippine society. Within this process, I will also identify the included as well as excluded discourses that could shed light on the inclusiveness of the IPRA as regards the case of the Badjao, the sea nomads of the Philippines.

III. An Epistemological Analysis

As is earlier mentioned, my research takes on a feminist postmodern approach. As such, it takes the perspective that gender is one among the other categories by which we may understand power relations as inequality and social exclusion. It views power not as monolithic, rather may come from nowhere or everywhere. It considers intersections of gender, class, and generation in understanding the root and dynamics of power relations obtaining in a given context. While putting on the “intersectional lens” moves us away from looking at a specific group of people as one homogenous entity, it also allows a space for the marginalized subjects to have an epistemic advantage as their voices have been commonly ignored.

However, one important note that I have more recently encountered in the course of my readings is as regards the epistemic privilege of marginalized subjects. Grosfoguel (2008:3) discusses about subaltern epistemic perspectives -- knowledge coming from below that produces a critical perspective of hegemonic knowledge in the power relations involved. He notes the importance of distinguishing “epistemic location” from the “social location”. He stresses that “the fact that one is socially located in the oppressed side of power relations does not automatically mean that he/she is epistemically thinking from a subaltern epistemic location” (ibid). He further explains that “the success of the modern/colonial world-system consists precisely in making subjects that are socially located on the oppressed side of the colonial difference think epistemically like the ones in dominant positions” (ibid). A challenge which I have to be more cautious of here is being keen about what knowledge, voice, or stories I get from my research informants, conscious whether their views reflect a certain kind of thinking and which side, if any, these are epistemically located and the fact that my own understanding of that view may also influence how such view may be taken, understood or negotiated.

There are also other tensions within the research that remain problematic. I have considered power as the umbrella concept with focus on its specific articulations within the nexus of inclusion and exclusion in policy and in lived experience. But I believe I tread on tricky ground in dealing with the notion of power within a national policy and linking it with the experiences of a relatively powerless group of people. It is very easy to get swayed with the idea that the state with its attendant governmentality such as policy (within which it holds the power of labeling its people as indigenous or invisibilizing them as well) is the root cause of their exclusion.

While I acknowledge being critical of the policy and seeing it as repressive, giving prominence to such may move me away from the postmodern epistemology that I would like to position myself towards a more central social constructivist, or even perhaps towards a critical realist position. Locating power and agency in the state policy leans more towards a ‘realist’ stance and viewing the state policy as having failed to recognize key differences between groups despite the best of intentions to accommodate them in the name of national unity may lie within the vicinity of a critical realist position. Not being careful of this nuanced understanding of power could also bar me from recognizing other practices of exclusion obtaining in the community that which may not stem from the state. Thus, the challenge of the research is to be more critical of the view of power, how power is patterned and unequal power relations reproduced, and it may require therefore more sensitivity in the field during which articulations of power may be seen – how power works, exclusions that are less familiar, community opposition or listening to what things mean to people.

This too entails that I have to start from people’s experiences rather than policy, that is, discovering policy in people’s experiences rather than in policy statements, though the deconstruction of the policy statements might play a role in the research. Cameron (2009b) explains that a conventional ‘post-modern epistemological approach would be to start from people’s voices and then deconstruct some key policy statements that affect/engage with their experiences to show how their low status is reproduced (and contested) ideologically and the pressures to ‘voluntarily’ mainstream themselves. This however has a methodological implication or even on the direction and structure of the research. Should I continue with looking at the relevant ‘top-down’ document that is the IPRA and do a discourse analysis of such document or put the policy discourse as background and concentrate on the dynamics of the experiences within the community?

But again, writing about people’s lived experience, I am reminded of Joan Scott’s poststructuralist critique of experience which demonstrates the dangers of empiricist narratives of experience and how stories of marginalized persons’ experiences (both personal narratives and the histories that draw on these) reinscribe the assumptions about identities, differences, and autonomous subjects that underlie available discourses (Stone-Mediatore in Narayan & Harding, 2000:110). Aware of this tension, I would like to be guided with some notes suggested by feminists such as Chandra Mohanty, as cited by Stone-Mediatore, in avoiding the naturalizing of experience and yet still productively read, teach, and defend stories of “marginalized experience” (ibid:111).

At the moment, what is clear to me is to look at the dynamics of the community at its cross-sections from inside out. It is also helpful to note that what should be avoided is giving state policy a high profile in the interviews with the Badjao informants and any significance of the policies should emerge, not be ontologically assumed. More importantly, I should not look at the state and community as two fixed, static concepts but allow these to be revealed in the course of the research; nor should I make truth claims about the Badjao people based on the outcomes of my research.

___________________________

References

Anderson, E. (2000) ‘Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science’, retrieved November 26, 2008 from http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/archives/sum2002/entries/feminism-epistemology/.

Cameron, J. (2009) 4223 Part B Sessions 5-11: Comparative Epistemology: Lectures Notes: Chapter 6 The Epistemology of Postmodernism and Poststructuralism, ISS: Development Research.

Chou, C. (2006) “Research Trends on Southeast Asian Sea Nomads”, Articles: Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, retrieved March 30, 2009 from http://kyotoreviewsea.org/images/images/pdffiles/Chou_final.pdf.

Gasper, D. & Apthorpe, R. (1996), “Discourse, Discourse Analysis, and Policy Discourse” in Apthorpe, R. & Gasper, G. (eds), Arguing Development Policy: Frames and Discourses. London: Frank Cass.

Grosfoquel, R. (2008) ‘Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality: Decolonizing political economy and postcolonial studies’, Eurozine, retrieved June 21, 2009 from http://www.eurozine.com/pdf/2008-07-04-grosfoguel-en.pdf.

Joshua Project. (2009). ‘Sama, Badjao of Philippines’ Peoples of the World Foundation, retrieved March 1, 2009 from http://www.joshuaproject.net/peopctry.php?rop3=114778&rog3=RP.

McGregor, S. (2004) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis--
A Primer’, retrieved June 21, 2009 from http://www.kon.org/archives/forum/15-1/mcgregorcda.html.

Naples, N.A. & C. Sachs (2000) ‘Standpoint epistemology and the uses of self-reflection in feminist ethnography: lessons for rural sociology’, Rural Sociology 65(2), 194-210, ca 7038.

Nash, J. (2008) Re-thinking Intersectionality, Feminist Review.

NCIP. (2008) ‘Ethno-group: Badjao’, retrieved December 18, 2008 from http://www.ncip.gov.ph/.

Stone-Mediatore, S. (2000) ‘Chandra Mohanty and the Revaluing of “Experience”’, in Uma Narayan and Sandra Harding (eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

United Nations Philippines. (2002) ‘Case Study 3: Twilight of the Sea People’, Rights-

Based Approach to Development Programming: Training Manual, July, pp. 85-88,

Exeter: Author.

Van der Hoogte, L. & Kingma, K. (2004) ‘Promoting Cultural Diversity and the Rights of

Women: The Dilemmas of ‘Intersectionality’ for Development Organizations’, Gender

and Development, 12(1), pp. 47-55.

Weldon, S.L. (2005) Rethinking Intersectionality: Some conceptual problems and solutions for the comparative study of welfare states, Purdue University.

Yanow, D. (2009) 3206-0809 Session 7: Frame Analysis Part I: Powerpoint Presentation, ISS: Research Techniques



[1] Other sources use “bajau”.


From 'Pedestal Women' to Peacemakers: Casting and recasting women's position in Muslim Mindanao

Abstract

This essay attempts to trace the casting and recasting of women’s position within the dynamics of separatism and Islamic resurgence in Muslim Mindanao. It hopes to demonstrate the remaking of Muslim women in Mindanao from ‘pedestal women’ to peacemakers from different periods in history. Given evolving conditions, it also endeavors to demonstrate the dynamism of gender in the political domain by looking at the role of women in the on-going peace process obtaining between separatist movement and the Government, as an emerging public sphere.

From ‘Pedestal Women’[1] to Peacemakers

Casting and recasting women’s position in Muslim Mindanao

Introduction

Although not in the least a Muslim majority country, the Philippines holds mainly to its southern part (Mindanao), a Muslim enclave that constitutes the largest minority group of about five percent[2] of its total population. The influence of Islam to the Philippine Muslim society came by way of Malaysia hence its culture and traditions are more akin to its Malaysian and Indonesian neighbors than to the rest of the country’s predominantly Christian population (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:209).

Notably however, “‘Muslim Mindanao’[3] has been the least served region in the Philippines since the 70s, with the highest poverty rates and the poorest human development indicators” (Rasul, 2009a). This marginalization is part and parcel of a centuries-old history of struggle, conquest and repression of the Muslims in the Philippines by a predominantly Christian society. Continual armed conflict has also aggravated this poverty (Abaño, 2007a) as the “war on terror” policy adopted by the Philippine government allowed it “to label the liberation fronts’ armed conflict as terrorism, and therefore fair game for counter-terrorism campaigns” (Rasul, 2009b).

The influx of Christian settlers in the Mindanao area which largely decimated the traditional homelands and political power of the Muslims was to become one of the main causes of social unrest in Mindanao (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:185). “The infamous ‘Moro wars’ date back to the seventeenth century when the Spanish colonial administration waged battles against the Muslims of Mindanao who refused to be Christianized, hence the designation of the present-day conflict in the southern Philippines as the ‘Moro question’” (ibid:186). The term ‘Moro’, which has been inextricably tied to Islam, is derived from ‘moor’, a pejorative used by the Spaniards to refer to inhabitants of North Africa and southern Spain which they also applied when they colonized the Philippines (ibid:188).

Separatist movements like the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF)[4], Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF)[5], and Abu Sayyaf[6], among others, have turned around this originally intended pejorative of the “Moro” into a subversive and unifying symbol of resistance and cohesion -- Bangsa Moro[7] (The Moro People). The common belief in Islam is a unifying factor for the three major groups from the different ethnolinguistic Muslim tribes, the Maguindanaons (the people of the flooded plains), the Maranaos (people living around the lake) and the Tausugs (people of the current), who have rallied the support of the Bangsa Moro in their struggle for self-determination (Alim, 1995).

Siapno opines that “the arena of society where the separatist movement and resurgence of Islam in Mindanao have had their most visible impact is that of gender relations” (1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:191). This visibility refers not only to the veil but also to how “Muslim women have been drawn into activities from which they have hitherto been barred by custom and tradition” (ibid). I follow Siapno’s question whether the ‘abnormal conditions’ related to the political insurgency in Mindanao that have catapulted women into a more publicly visible role has significantly contravened the traditional boundaries between Muslim women and men (ibid).

If we seek to understand the condition of women in a given Muslim society, “we have to see how Islam has been used to maintain their hold on power by different actors (state, political party, religious leaders, oppositional groups, etc)” (Shehada, 2009a) within specific historical and political conditions and how this has implications on gender roles. Thus, this essay attempts to trace the casting and recasting of women’s position within the dynamics of separatism and Islamic resurgence in Muslim Mindanao. It hopes to demonstrate the remaking of Muslim women in Mindanao from ‘pedestal women’ to peacemakers from different periods in history using insights from Abu-Lughod (1998) and Kandiyoti (1991). Given evolving conditions, it also endeavors to demonstrate the dynamism of gender in the political domain by looking at the role of women in the on-going peace process, obtaining between separatist movement and the Government, as an emerging public sphere using insights from Gole (1997).

The Separatist Movement and the Islamic Resurgence in Mindanao

The social unrest that besieged Muslim Mindanao in the 1970s coincided with a surging sense of Muslim identity among its populace. The Bangsa Moro, which have come to symbolized this “imagined community” that is an Islamic state were held together by an alliance of Muslim nationalists intent on gaining liberation from a national government which it sees as culpable of “land grabbing, military abuses, government oppression and neglect that have persisted for years” (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:226). “To the nationalists of Mindanao, Islam came to serve as a symbol for transcending rivalries and reinforcing loyalties in order to foster the commonly aspired goal of national independence” (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:188).

But this alliance was built on precarious foundation “for not only did the Muslims belong to different ethno-linguistic groups and regions, but there were also chronic political and dynastic rivalries between leading families within the regions” (Majul, 1988:911). Thus, the alliance did not prosper and four separate factions emerged on the political scene: the MNLF which consists mostly of Tausugs and operates mainly in Sulu; the MILF composed mainly of Maguindanaoans of North Cotabato; the so-called MNLF Reformist group, active in Lanao provinces populated mainly by Maranaos; and the Bangsa Moro Liberation Organisation based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, supported mainly by the conservative royalty (mostly Maranaos) (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:188). Abu Sayyaf Group, a radical splinter group from the MNLF which seeks to Islamicize the Moro identity has more recently entered the political scene. Each faction has waged bitter campaigns against the others, thus reflecting not only the pervasiveness of the ethnic factor, but also undermining the very credibility of a legitimate separatist movement in their bid to become the ‘true representativeness’ of the aspirations of the Muslim Filipinos (ibid:189).

The seeds of Moro discontent were crystallized as the main legacy of the ‘Jabidah massacre’[8] in 1968 where about 30 young Muslim soldiers were summarily executed on the island of Corregidor following an alleged mutiny. “They formed part of a group of about 180 Muslims secretly recruited by the military authorities (with the knowledge if not instruction of President Ferdinand Marcos) in a secret operation called 'Jabidah' for training[9] in jungle warfare, sabotage, and guerrilla tactics” (Majul, 1988:902). Investigation on the case was halted on grounds of national security and the media were asked to cooperate, thus, the matter was officially forgotten – but not by the Muslims (ibid). The incident fed the growing disgruntlement of Muslim nationalists which led to the subsequent formation of the MNLF and the MILF.

Hostilities in the Muslim Mindanao area started around 1971 “when leaders of Moro society published a manifesto demanding that the government take action to stop attacks on their community after a Christian-led para-military group, Ilagah, left 65 men, women and children, dead and mutilated at a mosque in Cotabato” (Abaño, 2007b). When the Philippine government answered, by declaring a Martial law, the MNLF launched a counter-offensive that marked its open declaration of a Moro secessionist movement (ibid). Since then, the area has been a battleground between government troops and the rest of the Muslim separatist factions wanting to establish their own Islamic state. “Over the last 10 years, the Philippine government has fully supported the war on terror, “internationalizing” the very local ethnic conflict in Mindanao, with allegations of collusion between al-Qaeda, the Jemaah Islamiah and the Abu Sayyaf Group, accusing the MNLF and MILF for cooperating or coddling the terrorist elements” (Rasul, 2009c). By far, “over 10 million people have been affected by the conflict, and more than a million have been displaced from their homes as of 2003” (Abaño, 2007c).

Even with the semi-autonomy that have been granted by the Philippine government to the MNLF-controlled areas, some still expressed being discriminated and articulated discontent for not having any actual control over their resources. While they resented the presence of the military, including American soldiers and the fact that the government maintains a bigger budget for war in Mindanao instead of education, others also railed against their madrasahs[10] being watched and targeted as terrorist schools if they are supported by Arab missionaries and relief agencies (ibid).

While Islam has played a cohesive role in the given historical events, it is perhaps simplistic to say that religion is at the root of all conflict in Mindanao as the dynamics of economic exploitation and political warlordism has also occupied a vital spot in these specific situations.

On the other hand, the resurgence of Islam in Mindanao has been attributed to three major interpretations (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:187). One interpretation is that Islam is utilized as a symbol of coherence by the factionalised separatist movement as displayed in the foregoing events. Two, that it is part of the larger international movement of Islamic resurgence which may be traced to the thousands of Muslim youths who availed themselves of scholarships to study in Egypt and returned with a deeper understanding of Islam and exposure to religious tendencies in the Muslim world (Majul, 1988:901). Many of them became part of a new and younger ulema[11]; others who did not return to dedicate themselves fully to religious activity served in the offices of traditional leaders while more than a few of the scholars had studied in military and professional schools in Egypt (ibid). Also, more than a thousand Muslims would make the annual hajj[12] to Mecca with some of them extending their journey to Muslim countries, especially Egypt and would return with a heightened religious fervour and loaded with Islamic literature for relatives and friends (ibid). Madrasahs and mosques flourished soon after, supported by Arab and Muslim non-Philippine teaching staff, with support coming from Muslim countries and international Muslim organizations (ibid). Three, the interpretation that it emerged as an alternative to, and a critique of, the demoralized leadership of the secular elite” (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:187). Muslim youth had greatly increased its political sophistication and would participate in student seminars and public demonstrations involving international issues (Majul, 1988:901). It would also become openly critical of its traditional leaders, especially those holding political offices, whom it charged with not doing enough for the cause of Islam and the social and economic uplifting of the Muslim community (ibid:902).

Militating against the typecast of a Muslim Woman

Whereas most literature ardently tackle the role of men in power positions, like the traditional elite and intellectuals and the ‘ulemas, within the dynamics of the separatist movement and the resurgence of Islam, little attention is given to the role of women (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:191). Yet, “women and Islam has also been a question implicated in the power struggle among political groups in any given Muslim society” (Shehada, 2009b). There is a double-edged typecasting of Muslim women as pedestal women, who occupies an important position in the lives of Muslim men, while being repressed, passive, and tagged as without initiative. This section tries to explore this typecasting by illustrating that the role of women in the separatist movement interspersed with changing values brought about by the Islamic resurgence has not been static, as they have been recruited into the traditional male arena that is politics and warfare. It also tries to address the earlier question whether the traditional boundaries between Muslim women and men have been breached as they actively take part in the struggle for liberation.

Muslim women in retrospect

A brief look back to discrete periods in Philippine history reveals the evolving position of women in Muslim society and provides a backdrop of the traditional roles that have boxed them through time. Philippine Muslim society prior to the coming of the Americans tells of “a very strong perception of rank and order, with commoners and slaves always tending to follow the datus[13] and their families” (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:210). “During this period, the Muslim women did not have the freedom to make choices for herself, especially in matters of education and marriage” (ibid). Women, for example, were married off to consolidate alliances among ruling families. There was much role differentiation on the basis of the distinction between the public and private space as women’s activities were centered in the home and women’s involvement in the decision-making process was largely confined to domestic affairs (ibid). Although there were some isolated practices, such as when women were able to get involved in politics or were able to conversely freely with men in public, these were mostly confined to upper-class women.

When the Americans gained control over the Muslim sultanate in 1899, attendant to their goal of “civilizing” the Muslims was the introduction of public health and mass education in the Muslim areas (ibid:212). Although received with much resistance at first, Angeles (in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:212-213) narrates that girls’ education indicated the objective of enhancing the domestic roles of women, saved for a school that was opened in Jolo for daughters of royal families in order to prepare women for leadership in their own communities and be role models and leaders of the people. Even then, the practice of arranged marriage continued during this period with the bride accepting the arrangement out of a sense of duty and family honor (ibid). But the larger goal of the American civilizing project was to make Muslims be like other Filipinos for political and economic expediency and women were to be instruments in this undertaking (ibid).

During the period of independence, government policy was geared towards integration of the Muslims into mainstream Filipino society. Education was still the potent tool for integration and pacification with the establishment of universities as a venue for cultural exposure between Muslims and Christians. Again, most of those who were able to access higher education were men and women from the aristocracy. It was also during this time that the Code of Muslim Personal Laws was promulgated as part of the laws of the country which provides that in case of conflict between the general laws of the Philippines and the Muslim Code, the provisions of the latter shall prevail. The applicability of the Code in the Muslim areas covered subjects like marriage, divorce, inheritance, and guardianship of persons but this did not guarantee favorable provisions for women (ibid:217).

The increasing visibility of Muslim women in the public sphere saw them joining ‘women’s associations’[14] and ‘women’s movements’[15] but which again was confined to upper- to middle-class women. Also, although argued by GABRIELA[16] and the MNLF, Amina Rasul-Bernardo of the MPBWAP[17] states that the liberating influence which urban women enjoy does not exist in the rural areas. Various types of Muslim women’s organizations that took part in the Muslim women’s movement also flourished during this period. They were described as having diverse characteristics which include, a) those that are encouraged by the government and are included in the National Council of Women of the Philippines; b) those that are concerned with promoting Islamic views on women; c) those that try to combine activities for women with promotion of Islam; and d) those that are concerned with national liberation (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:222).

Muslim women and the separatist movement

It is important to note here that while all factions of the separatist movement use Islam as a symbol of cohesion, women however, tend to experience Islam differently according to their class origin, age group, locale such as whether they live in an urban or a rural setting, and more importantly the extent to which they are involved in the armed struggle (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:198). These intersections in turn have a bearing on women’s participation in the separatist movement.

The MNLF women who refer to themselves as Bangsa Moro women, for example, came from various backgrounds. There are those who descended from the old aristocracy, from political families, from middle class families, and from the rural masses, women with college and graduate school education or women who never went to school at all, and represented various ethnolinguistic groups such as the Maranaos, Tausugs and Magindanaoans (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:223). The cause of the movement was not unknown to these women as they themselves seek justice amidst government and military oppression. Although it was traditionally perceived as a man’s role and it was unthinkable for a Muslim woman to be a revolutionary, some families did not register any objection to their women joining the cause, despite the risks, because they already had some family members in the MNLF (ibid). Women’s involvement with the MNLF ranged from joining the men in the hills, to serving as communication links between the members in the hills and those in the cities, delivering medicine, supplies, food, messages and information to the forces, smuggling ammunitions and small arms using the multiple folds of their traditional skirts (malong), and engaging in income-producing activities to support the war efforts (ibid:224). In other instances, women were engaged in consciousness-raising among the Muslims as MNLF leadership has encouraged women to read the Qur’an and during ceasefire, women started to discuss women’s rights in Islam in meetings (ibid:225).

Thus women’s involvement has treaded between peaceful times and wartime. Luz Rimban (1998 in PCIJ, 1999:167) tells the story of Ling Gumander, an MILF woman who farms a 10-hectare land inherited from her father in Matanog, Maguindanao. “Nine months of the year, Gumander supervises hired hands who harvest corn and peanuts that she then sells to the nearest market while in the remaining three months, she heads the 1,000-strong army of women who call themselves the Bangsamoro Auxiliary Brigade, the women’s unit of the MILF” (ibid). In this MILF territory which has been carved as an Islamic state, men and women, young and old are trained to defend themselves in case the enemy attacks and the MILF mujahideen[18] are away (ibid). But while women like Gumander are trained in warfare, they are barred from climbing up the ladder of political and military leadership and they are not permitted to fire their weapons unless attacked and as such will have to wait for orders from men (ibid:168). “Instead, they are assigned roles away from the battlefront: raising funds and collecting food, cooking, attending to medical needs, and overseeing the education of the combatants’ children in the village madaris, the Islamic schools where the Bangsamoro youth study the Qur’an[19]” (ibid). Gumander believes that fighting in the holy war is a call of Islam and Remy Balitok, deputy commander of the women’s brigade thinks that helping in the jihad guarantees them paradise when they die. Thus the MILF women gave no complaints except for their attire, shapeless robes called abayas that are worn over loose-fitting pants and a black veil called hijab[20] covering the hair and faces except for the eyes (ibid). While some women complain on the hot and cumbersome attire, others see it as protection from the lustful gazes of men (ibid).

As regards veiling however, it is a useful reminder that there is a nuanced interpretation of veiling in the case of Muslim women in Mindanao compared to other Muslim societies whose appurtenant meanings attached to the veil have been primarily linked to women being used as markers of cultural authenticity, a symbol of maintenance of convention, or a symbol of a conscious act of resistance to colonial rule. Other than being a recent phenomenon, the adoption of the veil by Muslim women in Mindanao is also relatively influenced by the extent women have been integrated into the international Islamic community, as such having been exposed for example to the Arab dress, or whether they have been educated (Siapno 1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994:194). As it is, Muslim women in southern Philippines who are older and more attuned to practicing folk Islam or relatively isolated from the dominant metropolitan culture largely because of lack of education and employment opportunities, are far more likely to wear the traditional malong[21] than the veil (ibid:194-196). On the other hand, “accordingly, Muslim women in Mindanao see the veil as a physical boundary which separates them from the westernized Christians, and the immorality and materialism associated with the (Christian) North” (ibid).

Meanwhile, women affected by the armed conflict in Central Mindanao speak of a life between displacements, evacuation centers and atrocities (Inside Mindanao, 2008). Fatima, a 40-year old widow who lost her husband in crossfire and a mother of eight narrates her plight amidst the breakdown of peacetalks in the area (Baikong, 2009). She and her family had to leave their home in Cotabato and settled in an evacuation center. “As the military intensified their offensive attacks to the rebels in some villages in Pikit, Fatima had to carry alone the huge responsibility of protecting her children during the times of crisis” (ibid). Fatima is just one of the widows of war in Mindanao who despite her suffering remains strong in her faith in Allah. She narrates,

“Allah helped me to see and accept the realities. I realized that dwelling on it will not be helpful for my children. I have to give them hope. I have to teach them that life is short and we are here to become our best. We all aspire here, that one day, us and our children will wake up with peace and justice. We hope that the government and the MILF peace panels will resume and solve the problem in Mindanao so that we can start our life anew,” she added (ibid).

Peacekeeping: Muslim women’s engagement in the negotiating table

Women have played key roles in times of war and during the peace process. Women are not only ready to take up arms but also provide every available support they can give to the men in belligerent occasions. They also carry the burden of being primary breadwinners and carers of the family every time the sporadic peace talks between the leadership of the Philippine government and the separatist movements wavered and armed hostilities between the parties ensue. Thus, women have a significant stake in promoting peace as they are the frequent victims of poverty and conflict at the ground level. “Unfortunately, women are still kept away from the table when decisions that affect their lives are made” (Abaño, 2007d).

So far, peace negotiations have been exclusively conducted between men, usually shrouded in secrecy, even with women’s vital contributions and stake for the most elusive peace in the Bangsa Moro areas. But due to the pummeling effects of critical peace and security conditions, women could no longer leave the negotiations to the men. A group of women advocates organized an international dialogue in August 2007 “dubbed as the "International Women's Peace and Solidarity Mission in Basilan and Mindanao," which marked a significant and most visible step towards women’s involvement in the peace process. The dialogue, participated in by international delegates from the Asia-Pacific region, specifically New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines called for the enhancement of the role of women in the peace process and of the need to highlight women's roles in, but not limited to, health, education, and post-conflict reconstruction activities (ibid). It also pointed out the critical role of the media in easing tensions by truth-telling – that, instead of painting the images of war, the media community must help project what the people are doing in order to address the conflict situation (ibid).

Another noteworthy initiative is the All-Moro Women Conference on Peace Processes: Realities and Options, held in Cotabato City in December 2007 which urged the fast-tracking of the peace processes of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) with the Government of the Philippines (GRP) and highlighted the all-important questions of indigenous people’s right to self determination, unity across the liberation fronts, and women participation in the peace processes (Morales, 2007). In the conference, the Bangsa Moro women clamored for more participation at the planning and implementation in crises situations and in the peace processes, citing the U.N. resolutions mandating women participation in peace building and peaceful resolution of conflicts in all levels while suggesting to involve civil society and institutionalization of women solidarity and laws affecting women like the Muslim Code of Personal Law (ibid). The male-dominated peace process was also challenged by the women on the grounds that it has no clear policies regarding the advocacy, persecution, and pursuit of justice for problems such as human rights violations and killings over land, resources and hatred based on discrimination, no restitution of rights, and no programs for healing dialogues and culture of peace where life stories and anger are released (ibid).

Conclusion

By all means, we have negated the typecasting of Muslim women as repressed, passive, and without initiative by illustrating the various roles of women in the discrete periods of history, in the separatist movement, and increasingly in the emerging public of the peace process. But the historical embeddedness of the casting and recasting of the variety of positions/roles of Muslim women in Mindanao makes for a less categorical and straightforward answer to the ‘women question’ in Muslim Mindanao – particularly whether the traditional boundaries between Muslim women and men have been breached as they actively take part in the struggle for liberation. It has been shown that these spaces opened for women have been borne out of necessity – given, taken, and traded back and forth by men as the need arises during war and peacetime in the name of the Bangsa Moro; and not out of the enlightened conviction of the men of the inherent rights of women as their equal partners as women remain to be viewed as vulnerable thus needing their protection.

Muslim men have shown support for the increased participation of women in the public space as in politics particularly the peace process which has become a new battleship of the long standing Christian-Muslim schism in the Philippines. But the expanding space and roles of Muslim women in this emerging public sphere do not guarantee that traditional boundaries between the sexes have been overturned or improved. At best, these appear to materialize as moments of agency for Muslim women. Nevertheless for this reason, it can be said that Muslim women in Mindanao, by themselves, have been active participants in identity-making and border-demarcating.

However, such expansion of women’s roles from the private domain to the public also entail more responsibilities for women as they are now expected to become productive participants in the quest for peace in a platform traditionally reserved for men without necessarily expecting men on the other hand to do the same for the traditional reproductive roles of women stationed in the home. Even more so, women are faced with extending their caring capacities to the increasing number of casualties of war in their community while keeping intact a prescribed image of a proper Muslim woman.

Nonetheless, women have realized that their stake in the struggle for liberation must come hand in hand with a vision of transforming gender relations. Although the vision is far from realization, the initial steps taken by women within the dynamics of the peace process in Muslim Mindanao at the moment is gaining ground. But while the gendered nature of the peace process is revealed, a further challenge in accepting such notion as an emerging public for Muslim women lies in the issue whether it is rid of the old cobwebs of class and ethnic differences that have contributed to the messiness of the separatist movement in Muslim Mindanao.

______________________________

References

Abaño, I. (2007) ‘In Ongoing War in Muslim Mindanao, Women Are Peacemakers and Breadwinners’, The Women’s International Perspective, retrieved May 25, 2009 from http://www.thewip.net/contributors/2007/10/in_ongoing_war_in_muslim_mindi.html.

Abu-Lughod, L. (1998) ‘Introduction: Feminist Longings and Postcolonial Conditions’ in Lila Abu-Lughod (ed.) Remaking Women: Feminism and Modernity in the Middle East. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Alim, G. (1995) ‘The Bangsa Moro Struggle for Self-Determination’, retrieved May 25, 2009 from http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/Modules/Modules/MuslimMindanao/bangsamoro_struggle_for_self.htm.

Angeles, V. (1998) Philippine Muslim women: Tradition and Change’, in Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad and John L. Esposito (eds.) Islam, Gender, and Social Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

Baikong (2009) ‘The Life of a Princess in the South’, retrieved May 25, 2009 from http://baikong.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/from-distress-to-hope/.

Discover the Networks (2005) ‘Abu Sayyaf Group’, Discover the Networks: A Guide to the Political Left, retrieved June 18, 2009 from http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6435.

Global Security (2006) ‘Moro Islamic Liberation Front’, retrieved June 18, 2009 from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/milf.htm.

Inside Mindanao (2008) ‘Life in Datu Piang: Personal account of a woman armed–conflict survivor’, retrieved June 19, 2009 from http://www.insidemindanao.com/article83.html.

Kandiyoti, D. (1991) ‘Introduction’, in Deniz Kandiyoti (ed.) Women, Islam and the State, Macmillan, London.

Majul, C. (1988) ‘The Moro Struggle in the Philippines’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, Islam & Politics (Apr., 1988), pp. 897-922, Talylor & Francis, Ltd., retrieved June 18, 2009 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3992672.

Morales, M.V., (2007) ‘Bangsa Moro women as walking bridges of peace’, Mindanews, retrieved May 25, 2009 from

http://www.mindanews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3531

Rasul, A. (2009) ‘DURIAN: Erosion of pluralism in democratic Philippines’, retrieved may 25, 2009 from http://pcid.org.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=202&Itemid=1.

Rimban, L. (1999) ‘In Battle Gear’, Her Stories: Investigative Reports on Filipino Women in the 1990s, Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.

Siapno, J. (1990) ‘Gender Relations and Islamic Resurgence in Mindanao, Southern Philippines’, in Camillia Fawzi El-Solh and Judy Mabro (eds.) Muslim Women’s Choices: Religious Belief and Social Reality, Berg Publishers, Providence and Oxford.

Shehada, N. (2009) 4326-0809 Session 8: Gender, Islam and the Position of Women I: Powerpoint Presentation, ISS: Women, Gender, Development.



[1]Muslim women narrate, “Women are considered as very important in the life of men yet are not given affirmation, perhaps because we cling to the tradition of the bangsa – pedestal women. But today, women are not content to be up on the pedestal. We have gone beyond that and are actually in the action. Men should take care. Women are partners of men to be by their side.” See Morales (2007.

[3] Siapno (1990 in El-solh & Mabro, 1994::186) notes that “the designation ‘Muslim Mindanao’ is misleading, for the reality is that Muslims only comprise around one third, while Christians make up some 66 per cent of the Mindanao population”. She bases this population estimates from the Ministry of Muslim Affairs dated 1983. For the purpose of this essay, I use ‘Muslim Mindanao’ to refer to the Muslim population in Mindanao.

[4] Organized in 1969 and is the largest and most organized Muslim movement in the country, see Haddad & Esposito, 1998.

[5] Formed in 1977 when Hashim Salamat, supported by ethnic Maguindanaos from Mindanao, split from the Moro National Liberation Front, advocating a more moderate and conciliatory approach toward the government. In January 1987, the MNLF signed an agreement relinquishing its goal of independence for Muslim regions and accepting the government's offer of autonomy. The Moro Islamic Liberation Front, the next largest faction, refused to accept the accord and initiated a brief offensive that ended in a truce later that month, see http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/milf.htm.

[6] Means "Bearer of the Sword" or "Father of the Swordsman" in Arabic, operated in its earliest days as a faction of MNLF. But in 1991, a number of ASG members, led by Abubakar Janjalani, split off to pursue a more fundamentalist battle against the Philippine authorities. They deemed MNLF too moderate and conciliatory. Its goal was unambiguous: to establish an Islamic State in Mindanao, see http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6435.

[7] "the Moro People" is the generic name for the 13 ethnolinguistic Muslim tribes in the Philippines which constitute a quarter of the population in Mindanao in the Southern Philippines. They number from 5-6 million and are found in every major island of the country. They share a distinct culture, speak different dialects, are varied in their social formation but share a common belief in Islam, see Alim (1995), http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/Modules/Modules/MuslimMindanao/bangsamoro_struggle_for_self.htm .

[8] Related to a dispute between the Philippines and Malaysia over territorial claims on the island of Sabah, which formally became part of the Federation of Malaysia but was protested by the Philippines claiming that Sabah had never been sold to foreign interests, and that it had only been leased (padjak) by the Sulu Sultanate and therefore remained the property of the Sultan and by extension the property of Republic of the Philippines.

[9] The Philippine government recruited nearly 200 Tausug and Sama Muslims aged 18 to 30 from Sulu and Tawi-Tawi as a special military unit tasked to foment dissent among Sabah’s non-Malay ethnic groups, closely aligned ethnically and culturally with the Bangsamoro. The training turned mutinous when the recruits discovered that the plan would mean not only fighting their brother Muslims in Sabah, but also possibly killing their own Tausug and Sama relatives living there. Also, the recruits had already begun to feel disgruntled over the non-payment of the promised monthly stipend. As recounted by a sole survivor, the young Moro recruits were taken in batches of twelve to a remote airstrip where they were executed with machine-gun by their military handlers.

[10] Islamic schools

[11] refers to the educated class of Muslim legal scholars engaged in the several fields of Islamic studies

[12] a pilgrimage to Mecca (Makkah) and is the fifth pillar of Islam, an obligation that must be carried out at least once in their lifetime by every able-bodied Muslim who can afford to do so

[13] Datus exercised power over their followers, took care of them, utilized their services when necessary, and administered justice; it was a patron-client relationship (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:230).

[14] Can be any grouping of women – sociocultural groups, religious associations of women and others formed on the basis of shared interests of women (Angeles in Haddad & Esposito, 1998:219)

[15] May involve women representing various interests and goals but are interested in effecting changes that would benefit women in different aspects of life; in most instances they are premised on the idea that women have been deprived, discriminated against, or not allowed to realize their full potentials because of certain constraints that reflect a patriarchal society (ibid).

[16] Acronym for General Assembly Binding Women for Reforms Integrity, Equality, Leadership, and Action, an umbrella organization for over 100 women’s groups

[17] Acronym for Muslim Professional and Businesswomen’s Association of the Philippines

[18] a person involved in a jihad (struggle)

[19] the central religious text of Islam

[20] “head cover and modest dress for women" among Muslims

[21] a traditional "tube skirt" made of handwoven or machine-made multi-colored cotton cloth, bearing a variety of geometric or okir designs; traditionally used as a garment by numerous tribes in the Southern Philippines and the Sulu Archipelago.